Home

Advertisement

Customize
Dec. 30th, 2004 @ 12:16 am Before I Became Numb
Family turmoil is afoot, and I am dizzy and nauseous from too much truth in too brief a time-span. It's far too painful to recount what is happening in the here and now, so the previous two entries dredge up old melancholies for your titillation.

I wouldn't have thought of displaying these works again, but I spoke with one of my longest-standing friends, a well-recognized writer in his day, who now is a copy editor at a magazine that is most distinguished by how useless it's been for several decades.

In any reasonable assessment, one must pronounce him lapsed as a writer, exchanging the unwieldiness of the empty page for the much more manageable burden of correcting the prose of writers less talented and less idealistic than himself. When I think of myself as a lapsed writer, as I often do, I maintain the perspective that my fall was hardly enough to twist an ankle, whereas he has fallen from heights unimaginable to most mortals.

When I told him about my current travails, he suggested I return to writing memoirs, reminding me of the story "Lenny," that appeared in the NY Press sometime in the late 1980s. He said some very flattering things about the story, while I argued with him.

"Putting the quality of the writing aside, it's a miserable story," I opined. "Who would want to read that?"

"I think that kind of memoir is very popular right now, actually."

"A literary equivalent of 'reality TV?' I'm not sure I want to feed into that."

We then chuckled at the great masses of unwashed idiots, although neither of us, I am sure, are innocent of watching. Reality TV has a pleasant numbing effect that can give the mind's surface a glassy sheen, no matter the turmoil quaking beneath. And it doesn't exact the price that chemical indulgence always brings. Unfortunately, these stories do not have such a calming effect.

"Lenny" and "Jailhouse Tattoos" were written within a few months of each other. I use the word "retarded" in the first of these stories quite consciously; "learning-disabled," aside from its intrinsic inelegance as a phrase, was not in use during the period the story covers.

"Tattoos" appeared toward the end of my year-long stint as a newspaper columnist for one of the Newhouse papers in New Jersey, though I don't advise you to seek out the other columns, you would be disappointed.
Exact Likeness
ninku
Dec. 30th, 2004 @ 12:12 am Lenny
A swamp in the American South; spanish moss hangs in grey-green tendrils over a watery bog. There's the buzzing of insects, the watery slosh of snake or lizard. Most of all, there is the pungent smell of wetly rotting vegetation, a jungle eating itself to provide mulch for its next generation.

There is also a young woman here in this swamp. I believe she is blonde beneath the mud that streaks her hair. I believe she is attractive under the layer of grime. In some way the mud and sand that cling to her add a terrible and primal note to her beauty, heightening it. The crazed look in her eyes, the way she manically staggers through the bog, out-of-place but still belonging here, forever a part of this swamp. She tears at her long, soiled hair and then she screams an endless scream, and no one, no one on earth knows why she screams.

Grampa moved like he was made of wood and wire, but he liked to swing his cane when he walked. When we walked together, his gray hand held mine with a firm, gentle attention that, as a child, I thought was my due; it's only across the years that I can feel the love in it.

A retired railroad man who had begun his career at the end of the last century, who had outlived most of those who were near to his heart, Grampa must have known that he was ending his days then and there, living in the spare room of his son's suburban house on the outskirts of Buffalo. He, my father and I all shared the same name, Robert Houston Martin and, though I knew Grampa loved my sisters, I realize now that I was the treasure of his last days on earth.

But he was an Irishman, not the sort of man to spoil a child; his generosity was of a different kind. When I was caught playing with my sisters' paper dolls, my parents patiently explained to me that these were girls' toys, that I shouldn't be interested in them, and that the property of others called for respect. But Grampa took me for a walk the next day and bought me my first comic book.

Though I was only five, I clearly remember the first moment I held that book in my hand. There was Woody Woodpecker, whom I'd seen only on the glowing screen of television and movies, now on the flat, but glorious, printed page. The cover's illustration featured two smaller woodpeckers that I'd never seen before (nephew and niece, though, on TV, Woody had no relatives); they'd accomplished some strange mischief to Woody's great consternation. At the top of the cover was another picture of Woody, astride a bicycle made out of two letters from his first name (though I couldn't read, I recognized the pattern of his name from the countless times I'd seen it flashed before me on television).

It was Woody on that double-o bicycle that most delighted me. I think it was the revelation that, for that troublesome woodpecker -- the bane of millionaire walruses everywhere -- letters and words, this dry code of adults, could be made into vehicles and playthings.

When I remember my astonishment, I remember too the angle and quality of the morning light reflected from the ink-coated paper, telling me that it was no later than eleven, as early as ten, though on that day I was too young to have such a sense of time. In the same way I can now discern my grampa's amusement at my delight, his ancient dry giggle at the way that my eyes widened.

It was not many mornings later that my grandfather found himself unable to rise from bed. The doctor came, my sisters fought with me, my parents snapped at each other. But when my parents decided that I should go visit Aunt Catherine, I knew that, when I came back, Grampa would be fine.

The night before I left, I rested uneasily in my bed, in the room next to Grampa's. I thought about old people, about what happened when old people got older. I decided that, when you got as old as you could possibly get, then you started to get younger again, younger and younger until you were a baby, ready to begin again the long climb to adulthood. Though the theory had flaws, it comforted me, and I slept.

Aunt Catherine lived in the center of the city of Buffalo, among the ugliest of cities anywhere in the world. But she was our wealthy relative. The building she lived in was grimy and gray on the outside. Within, it was a vast, high-ceilinged townhouse, lavishly furnished. At that age, I had no fix on the difference between wealth and middle-class comfort, but I knew that Aunt Catherine's home was different in kind from any other home I'd seen.

Catherine had married a man of national prominence in the field of electronics, a man whose last name was nearly a household word in those days. They had an infant son named Jimmy, and Uncle Al had come into the marriage with a son of his own who was my age, Lenny.

I looked forward to my visits to Aunt Catherine's, though I seldom felt that they ended too soon. I can only remember her with a drink in her hand -- Scotch, always Scotch, cut by a few ice cubes that had precious little time to melt before a refill -- and a cigarette in the other. She looked much like my father, a similiar profile, though her face was sharper, contoured more by bone than by muscle, and she had the same rust-red hair. And where my father was humorously cynical (he talked back to television commercials with sardonic jibes), Aunt Catherine was bitter.

She did not guard her bitterness, and I remember that she often spoke to me as she might speak to any adult. I can't remember her words, only their flavor of bile. No doubt, she was a lonely woman and, as young as I was, I was not too young to feel some pity for her.

Her world revolved around Jimmy, who was then about two, and well on his way toward becoming a thoroughly spoiled rich kid. Much of her bitterness rested its weight on her stepson, Lenny. Lenny was retarded.

I loved Lenny. My selfish reasons for this love had to do with the problems of my own childhood; the constant uprooting of my family when my father, eager to be a good provider, would volunteer for a transfer each time Sears, Roebuck and Company opened a new store in a new location. We would move to another, larger home in a more distant suburb, and I'd again be a new kid in the neighborhood, excluded from games, challenged to fights that I couldn't win. I grew more and more a loner, in a pattern that would continue through my entire childhood, and into my adult life. I never did learn to ride a bike, or to throw and catch a ball properly; I grew more and more alone, with television and, later, books as my main companions.

I did have some friends, but these were hard to earn, and easily lost when again we moved away; eventually I no longer even bothered to extend myself. But before my family left New York, I would see Lenny four or more times a year, which made him my only friend of any constancy.

Now I turn his image in my mind and I can only see him as beautiful; plain, regular features, marked by the openness of prolonged innocence. He wore coke-bottle lenses that made him appear as alien as I felt, with his blue eyes made huge, projected beyond the plane of his face, until he removed the glasses to rub his eyes and squint. Then they would be normally sized and normally set, but even more vulnerable, blinking against the loss of vision.

It was Lenny who told me that my grandfather was dying. We were walking on the large spiraling red-carpeted staircase that swept down from the second floor into Aunt Catherine's living room. When Lenny told me this, I remember looking in memory at the last time I had seen Grampa. My parents must have tried to avoid my seeing him, but the doctor, when he arrived, had left the bedroom door open. He was lying on the bed in his room, still and dry as an old branch, his eyes closed in sleep or coma, his mouth open, his breath an audible wooden rasp.

I had some idea of death. Television had given me images of blazing six-guns, fighter planes down in flames, the screech of brakes followed by the impact of shattering glass and twisting metal. I had never reflected on the more common sort of death, a simple winding down, a collapse of the body; a death more real because it was unavoidable.

Whatever fiction there may be here is the unconscious fiction of memory, but I believe it was the morning of the next day that Aunt Catherine entered Lenny's room, seething. We were playing on the floor, perhaps we were moving toy trucks back and forth that were filled with imaginary earth. But I sharply remember the two of us looking up at her as she stormed in.

"Lenny!" Her tone was already piercing, accusatory. "You pee-peed on the floor again! How many times do I have to tell you to be careful when you pee? Are you a moron? Don't you have ears? Can't you hear? Why do I have to be on my hands and knees cleaning up after you every time you pee?"

Though I was to some extent accustomed to Aunt Catherine's abuse of Lenny -- this wasn't the first time she had described him as a moron -- I had never hated her until that moment. I knew that if my own mother had found it necessary to speak to me about such a thing, she would never have said a word to me about it in front of anyone. I could feel Lenny's pained embarassment in the bristling silence that followed my Aunt's outburst. And then he spoke, in that voice of his, marked by the nasal whine of the asthmatic: "My real mother would never talk to me like that!"

His real mother. It had never occured to me before that, somewhere, Lenny had a "real" mother. I'd never heard her mentioned before or since and, later, when I spoke to my own mother, she claimed no knowledge of this woman.

Aunt Catherine was as shocked as I was by Lenny's sudden assertiveness; her face twisted into a scowl, and her tone grew even more severe. "Your real mother!" she huffed. "Your real mother! The last anybody heard of your real mother, she was screaming crazy in the swamp!" She turned and stalked out of the room.

There were other visits to Aunt Catherine's, but they grew less frequent, and then Sears opened its first store in Pittsburgh and we moved out of state. Then I entered my teens and the anger that I felt over my childhood began to surface, much of it directed at my family. But the family proved a poor target; when I was 12, there was already a tumor growing in my father's brain that, in the course of another year, would make him crazy, impoverish him and his family, and then kill him. At the time, I felt that I had little to mourn. Like many good providers, my father was most distinguished by his absence from home. And, in the period of poverty that began with my father's illness, I at last began to make friends among people whose values weren't shaped in the suburban mold.

Our family re-entered the middle class when my mother married again, and my life returned to its old, lonely pattern. In spring of the year 1966, the first year that most Americans heard of Vietnam and LSD, I left home at the age of 17, thinking to save my life or end it. Over the next two years I spent three months at home, two months in state mental institutions, and much of the rest of that time on the streets of New York and San Francisco.

During one of my recuperative stays at home, I was told that Lenny had died in Vietnam. At the time, it was just one more bitter pill, swallowed quickly with a draught of anger. Self-preoccupied, I saw it only as validation for my own choices -- after all, it was only my time in mental institutions that had allowed me to escape that useless war.

If there are ghosts, they must be products of such memories as these, memories that, even when they are buried or deliberately neglected, vibrate with a hunger for resolution.

In the last 17 years of my mother's life, I did not speak to her more than seven or eight times. By avoiding each other, we found that we no longer fought about values, about money, about what I chose to do with my life. We no longer made each other miserable.

Two months ago, I remembered my last conversation with my mother, shortly before her death.

She had called only to apologize for the sort of childhood I'd had. I denied it. I told her apologies were unnecessary, that my childhood was not so bad. I blamed the drugs, I blamed the times.

Just two months ago, I remembered that conversation, remembered the apology that I had denied, and realized that my mother and I both knew that I was lying; I realized that I was still angry enough to let her die without the forgiveness that must have been so difficult for her to seek. I remembered this and, for the first time, I gave her my forgiveness, and for the first time, I cried for my mother six years dead.

None of my living relatives know the details of Lenny's death, or how it happened that a mentally handicapped teenager was accepted into the military. I have filed with the army to receive a copy of his military record. I don't expect his record to tell me much more than where he died, and perhaps the nature of his wounds. But it seems important.

Because now, when some very old wounds of mine are just beginning to close, the woman who is screaming in the swamp and the boy who is bleeding in the jungle seem not so very distant to me. They scream and they bleed for each other, until their pain becomes a single ache. I need to find a reason to believe that, in the end, they were able to touch one another, if only for a moment, and to ease each other into peace.
Exact Likeness
ninku
Dec. 29th, 2004 @ 09:49 pm Jailhouse Tattoos
Love makes people forget that mixing souls can be like a blending of storms; no two people's desires ever run in parallel, though love makes us believe, sometimes for long enough, that they do.

I'm thinking now of a couple I knew who got together s few years ago. I met them in a bar called Redhead's, a waterfront dive in Hoboken, New Jersey, run by a retired stripper -- probably the last working man's bar in an industrial town where all the industry has shut down, a town now run by young lawyers and accountants that discovered low-cost luxury condos and an easy commute to New York. The last few working men of the town, and their unemployable sons -- the "Jersey white trash" of the town -- still hang on by their fingernails, some of them hanging out in this garish hole that no yuppie would enter.

Just so you know, I came to Hoboken, and made the crimson-painted walls of this particular joint my second home, after being kicked in the head by love myself. When I met George and Donna I was still not far enough away from that hurt to see it clearly. It was the story of their love affair that ultimately helped bring that part of my life to a conclusion.

George was a truck driver, working regularly for a firm in Bayonne, New Jersey, hauling chemical products to the west and midwest. He was simple guy. Maybe that was because of the chemicals he hauled, or maybe from working on trucks in a closed garage where the carbon monoxide could get to him, or maybe George was simple just because he was uncomplicated. Whatever the reason, he was a guy you talked to about trucks, or the weather, and not much else. In Redhead's, there was nobody who didn't like George, but then no one was really crazy about him, either. He was one of those guys who was just there.

The year before, George had a turnpike accident, when a car heading in the other direction jumped the median and landed flat in the middle of the lane ahead of him. George could have plowed his semi right over the little Japanese import and escaped unharmed, and the driver of the car--who had passed out drunk behind the wheel--would never have felt a thing, probably would never have woken up. Instead, George braked; the semi jackknifed; his cab detached and went skidding broadside into the passenger car with just enough force to bounce it out of harm's way. The drunk came out of it without a scratch. George totaled his semi and suffered a concussion and a multiple fracture of his left leg that the doctors fixed with two metal pins.

No one would ever say that Donna was simple. Her life was complicated, and so was her way of dealing with it. Perhaps she was simpler when she was 19, and married the first man who made love to her (or so she said), who was also the father of her little boy. The marriage didn't last. As much as she loved her child, Donna had too much life to live to be a full-time mother, so the boy lived part-time with his grandmother, and part-time with Donna.

She first showed up in Redhead's in the spring, and started coming in for a couple of hours or more most every night, creating a presence that would light up the den of grumbling men. She was no raving beauty, but attractive enough, and she had a way of making every man in the bar feel at ease speaking with her, flirting with her, and thinking maybe of taking her home.

To the best of my knowledge, there was only one man who ever did take her home from that bar. He gave his name as Ray, but every once in a while he would drop a heavy hint that his real identity remained secret. He tended to smog up his past, but certain towns -- Little Rock, Memphis and Fort Worth -- got more mention than others. He was a big guy, dangerous if he wanted to be and, though he never spoke about prison, you knew from the crude decorations that covered his arms that he'd been locked up for a long time with a needle and a bottle of ink.

But he smiled easily, and I only saw his temper rise when he thought that a lady was being abused. And he believed that all women were ladies until proven otherwise.

Ray wasn't always around when Donna showed up; and one night in particular there was something about her--it was in her eyes--that said that she wasn't going home alone.

I was sitting next to George when I noticed it, and pointed it out to him; he didn't believe me. But Loretta was bartending, and she was bored with seeing George drink alone every night, and lots of days, too, while he waited for his insurance settlement to come through. "She's always liked you, George," she said, though Donna barely knew he existed at that time. "You ought to go over and talk to her."

George picked up his beer and moved down three seats to the stool beside Donna. Within a few minutes, their public passion was providing the high point of the evening for Redhead's usual crowd of unhappily married, and lonely single, men.

When I stepped into Redhead's the next day, Loretta was again on duty. “Did you hear about George and Donna?” she asked. "They're engaged to be married. They're already planning a wedding at the end of the month."

George and Donna's engagement was about all anybody in the bar talked about for the next few days, mostly shaking their heads, predicting doom. Among the small handful of women who hung out in the joint, Rose was the only one you could count as Donna's friend; according to her, Donna was most excited about the house that George had promised to buy for her and her boy with the insurance money. "It's like she's not marrying a man," she said. "It's like she's marrying a house."

A couple of weeks later, the night before their wedding day, George and Donna rented a hall and threw a party. I chose not to go. Instead I sat at the bar, empty except for myself, Loretta, and Ray, the man with the jailhouse tattoos. Around midnight, George and Donna and what remained of the party came into the bar.

Everybody was wasted, especially George; not long after the couple entered and took two seats beside me, George's head hit the bar and stuck there.

Donna and I talked, a very brief conversation that I don't recall. It somehow ended with the two of us wrapped around each other, sharing deep kisses, groping one another, acting unaware of the unconscious groom and the twenty or so members of the wedding party that surrounded us. This went on, probably about the length of one song on the jukebox, before Donna broke away. She roused George as if nothing had happened, telling him she wanted to go home.

The couple and most of the partiers left, and after a little bit so did Ray. Loretta cleared the empties, then walked toward me with a disapproving smirk on her face. "You're such a bad boy," she said. "Look at this."

She handed me a note, written in Donna's uneven scrawl.

"Ray left that on the bar when he left," she added.

The note read: "I'll always love you."

Of course, we laughed.

For a long while after the wedding, I didn't see George or Donna at all; but there were frequent reports about how the marriage was going, mostly from Rose.

May. "Y'know that George got his settlement last week? He put the down payment on a house and a new truck..."

Later in May. "Did you hear? George's ex-wife heard about the settlement and got her lawyer on him for back child support..."

June. "George is in the hospital. It's his back...they're not covered for it if the insurance company won't accept that it was caused by the accident..."

August. "They lost the house..."

Later in August. "They lost the truck..."

October. "Donna's having real money problems supporting the both of them on her salary...she can barely manage to give her mom money for the boy's support..."

That was the last I heard of them before I saw George and Donna again, in November, on one of the first really cold nights of the year. It was perhaps three in the morning, and I was walking home, again a little bit drunk, returning from an uptown 24-hour diner. I was walking by 14th and Adams, near the projects -- the center of the "white trash" buffer that separates Hoboken's yuppies and its blacks. I saw George standing in front of a building in the middle of the block, the building where Ray lived.

George was clutching a corduroy jacket tight against the cold. He stood there, weaving, drunk, unsteady on his bad leg, and staring at the window of Ray's apartment.

Then he started shouting, a tortured howl:

"DAH-NA!"

"DAHHHNNA!"

Hearing it made my bones ache. It was a cry against petty fate, a lament for all that's imperfect in every human being.

He repeated the shout several times as I stood perhaps twenty yards away, glued to the spot -- waking, for the first time in a long time, to pain that was not my own.

Then, he shouted again, in a final anguished burst: "Donna! I HATE YOU!"

In another moment, the window flew open, and Donna appeared. She shouted, "I LOVE YOU, GEORGE."

Then, more softly, she said, "Go home."

There was more to their story, I suppose. But after that I stopped paying attention.
Exact Likeness
ninku
Dec. 19th, 2004 @ 02:26 am A Tragi-Farce in Too Many Acts


Today at Macy's, it was a day for wallets. And I had the key to the display case.

Customer after customer begged my attention to accompany them to the wallet cases: Perry Ellis, Calvin Klein, Tumi, Nautica, Alfani, Michael Koors, Tommy Hilfiger. The discounts were steep, and one rather nice multi-pocketed number from Nautica (designated "the Traveler") was clearance priced at $9, an unadvertised special that only manifested itself when a customer bought one at the register, causing several people to demand the same wallet, of which I could find only four further specimens. (I sacrificed my break to search further -- found one more -- and stood on line to buy one; with employee discount, a $30 wallet for seven bucks, not bad at all.)

As I handled the swelling wallet traffic, a few of the customers started to get steamed at me as I made them wait while I serviced previous customers; I apologized becomingly, and assured them that they would have my full service and attention when their turn came, just as the customer I was currently helping had.

While the discounts certainly helped to move the merchandise, I wasn't doing a bad job of selling, either. A couple of times I sold the model of wallet I bought for myself a few days ago by flashing it from my pocket, a slim design Calvin Klein bookfold with my cards and ID neatly arranged in its pockets. As a result, I was feeling rather good about my ability to handle the job.

I was working the day shift for the last time; for the rest of the week, right through to (and including) December 24, I was scheduled to work from 3:45 in the afternoon until fifteen past midnight. This was a problem, as the last bus home departs precisely at 12:15, even earlier (11:15 pm) on Sunday. Or it would be a problem, had I not already discussed this issue with my manager, who had authorized me to arrive early and leave late, as needed.

I had been reflecting earlier on the people I worked with at Macy's; this morning when I arrived at work, I was embraced by two of my coworkers who were sincerely expressing pleasure at seeing me that day. I've seldom worked among such outgoing people, and, though there were a couple of points where managers have been short-tempered with me, I have otherwise had only pleasant days at Macy's.

That is, until today at about 4:15 pm or thereabouts, when I was approached by a senior Macy's employee who wished to talk to me about a "transaction." He identified himself as the Security Director.

I found someone to take the display case keys and followed this gentleman off the floor and up the escalator toward the security offices. Along the way I could only think about that $30 Nautica wallet purchased for $7; had I somehow violated some unlearned protocol?

Soon, once ensconced in the Director's office, dominated by a video screen displaying a robot camera that detects and follows any unusual movement on the floor, I was interviewed about a transaction that took place on December 12, approximately one hour after I began work on that day. I was presented with a facsimile of a cash register tape showing a series of items purchased. All of them showed a 20% discount, which was generated by a scanned coupon, perfectly legitimate.

There was among these a purchase of two sweater items; these items were reduced by two discounts; one of 40% and another of 15%. in addition to the %20 discount generated by the coupon.

I cannot properly account for the three discounts that appear on this item.

I know that I have overridden prices and discounts to bring items in line with advertised sales and information supplied to me by management about sales; repeatedly I was told that the database connected to Macy's registers do not always have the complete sales info when a sale begins. I know that I have not applied such changes without being informed to such a situation by management or by unambiguous statements in a Macy's advertisement.

But I do not recall ever being told that a sweater item was ringing up incorrectly and needed to be corrected. I have no means of accounting for the error, except perhaps by the fact that this transaction occurred on my third day at Macy's, at which time I was still somewhat new and for that reason subject to error.

Because this transaction cost Macy's slightly in excess of $100, I understood the concern regarding it, and I wasn't upset about the interview in the security office. In fact, my interviewer expressed how pleasant I was to deal with, and seemed entirely accepting of my insistence that, whatever the specific case may be, this error only was likely to occur if I were honestly attempting to bring the register's prices in line with Macy's advertised specials.

Throughout the interview, however, the security executive was typing at his keyboard. At the end of our cordial keyboard, he printed up a document that looked remarkably like a police case confession, and he asked me to sign.

There was nothing in it that said I had deliberately defrauded Macy's. But neither was there anything exculpatory in it. It was a statement that that I had misapplied discounts and caused Macy's a "lost" of funds (spell-check can't catch everything).

I hesitated to sign, and asked my interviewer what might be the results of signing?

He advised that I might get a "write-up"; that I might be suspended for 24 hours; that I might be discharged.

If I'd had more presence of mind, I would have detected the lie, but thinking a "write-up" wouldn't be so bad, I signed the damned thing.

But "suspended for 24 hours?" Why would you suspend a thief for 24 hours?

It's a common ploy nowadays -- "suspend" the errant employee for 24 hours, saying the situation will be "reviewed," then call a day later to tell them the result of the "review" is, you are canned.

The very mention of 24-hour suspension should have told me that my path was decided, in four simple steps, before I was ever spoken to:

1. Interview

2. Document to be signed

3. 24-hour suspension

4. Canned

I am sure that the Security Director knows as well as I that this was an innocent register mistake by a new hire. To steal by changing discounts in such an obvious record would simply be stupid. There are far more transparent ways to steal at Macy's, fully apparent to all that work there. But of course, since such things are harder to detect(nearly impossible, despite the robotic cameras), it isn't so easy to bust people on them. So I, having made an error in plain sight, get to ride the Security Department railroad, and the document produced by this ride is used as evidence that the Security Department is doing its job.

I should have known.

...

Before being hired for this job, I recall a "group interview" at the Herald Square Macy's, during which the Human Resources Director asked only a single question. She painted a scenario:

"Let's say Jim is your greatest friend in the world; you grew up together, and have always been close. You recommend Jim for a job at Macy's, and he is hired, he works in the watch department. One day you head to Jim's department to ask him when he's taking lunch, and you see Jim slip a watch in his pocket. What do you do?"

Unanimously, one after the next, the interviewees advised they would go directly to a supervisor and turn life-long friend Jim in.

I was half-tempted to tell the HR director that she had just asked a question that was, in fact, a filter for traits opposite to what she should be seeking; she was locking in a result that Macy's would fail to hire any genuinely honest person.

Instead, I told her that I couldn't predict what I might do in this scenario without first speaking to my "lifelong friend" Jim, and that thereafter, in the best-case scenario, Jim and I would sit down with a supervisor so that we could all three discuss what had occurred, and what could be done.

As soon as the answers to that question were collected, the HR director left the interviewees alone in the room, and I got a quick laugh by remarking to the woman next to me, "Remind me not to make friends with any of these people."

Anyway, Herald Square passed me by, no surprise...and the same question never arose at the Macy's where I was later hired.

Of course now, no matter how desperate I become, I can never hope to work at Macy's again. The thief-mark is on me, permanently in their security database.

Tomorrow sometime, they will call me to tell me the result of their "review." I doubt they'll be saying "Hey, tump, it looks like we made a big fuss over nothing, come on back."

...

The first time I ever worked a cash register was about 32 years ago, at a small occult bookstore at 625 Broadway in Manhattan, Samuel Weiser Books. Punk poet Patti Smith bought flying saucer books, filmmaker Harry Smith hung out with Crowleyites, Todd Rundgren bought anything about sound and color (I introduced him to the Alice A. Bailey books that later were interpreted in his half-hour "Treatise on Cosmic Fire" track on the Initiation LP.) It was a very cool store.

The first day I worked the register, somehow it came up short $200. I was as mystified by that anomaly as by the current one. Two hundred dollars in 1972 was a lot more than $100 today. And $200 in a tiny downtown bookstore is a lot larger loss than $100 from the coffers of Federated Department Stores, the owners of Macy's, Bergdorf's, Bamberger's and god-knows-what-else.

But there it was, $200 short. One of the owners told me about it; this was Freddy Weiser, who at the time was aware of his coming demise, from cancer.

After telling me of the shortage, Freddy just shook his head and said to me, "Tump, I don't know what you're doing, but whatever you do, just make sure the register comes out right."

I worked there several more years, to well after Freddy's passing, and another such situation never occurred.

...

Does it take an especially twisted mind to see Freddy's reaction as the essentially sane response of the two described? If not, then why has the rational become so exceptional?

I can't quite imagine the psychic landscape that the HR Director and the Security executive described above are living in. It brings to mind how Coca Cola has re-introduced, this Christmas, the Cola-drinking CGI Polar Bears, with no apparent thought of how this ad would play amid recent news of melting polar ice caps.

After a day like today, I would expect to feel a sense of disconnect from reality, but instead I feel isolated by my own sanity, and fearing for the rationality of the rest of the world.
Exact Likeness
ninku
Nov. 24th, 2004 @ 02:56 pm My somewhat bright and shiny career
One should keep in mind that literature is classless in a way few other fields of endeavor are. In my youth, the educational forms available to me were chafing, and I left school and home at the age of 17. In the real world that I was ill-prepared for, the only field of accomplishment I was suited for was writing, and I made a moderate living at it for some 20 years: first reader for Doubleday, writer of jacket copy for Dell, book review editor for a publishing trade, then editor of that trade. In the years following, I was editor of several different nationally-distributed US magazines. None of it was art, though I strived to do my work artfully, and I was usually deeply interested in the genres with which I dealt. At no time did anyone ever ask to see my college degree (that I at first claimed to have).

When the music magazine I was editing folded due to a Jimmy Swaggert-led campaign that framed rock lit as pornography (before Swaggert was himself found in a motel room with a hooker), I utterly deflated and retreated from the writing business. Subsequently I aquired a couple of film-writing credits, though this was more the result of a friendship with a highly creative filmmaker whose vision I could augment, rather than any vision of my own.



[Addendum to newspaper clipping: I detest Motley Crue, and they did not belong in the magazine. The Seka-Motley Crue picture was the idea of my co-editor, Danny Fields -- yeah the famous one, who once edited Tiger Beat, who had connections to Andy Warhol, who figures in stories about the Doors, the Stooges and the Ramones. Unfortunately, it was often a tug-of-war with Danny to get him to see any difference between Ronnie James Dio and James Hetfield. This was a year or two before Nirvana finally developed the synthesis of metal, punk and pop that people were primed for, making everything crystal clear for everybody.

It's hard to explain, but there was a tiny minority of fans at that time who knew that Nirvana, or a group very much like them, was inevitable. If Hard Rock had fully gone the way I wanted it to, it would have been the John the Baptist to the whole post-punk deal, leading to the possibility that I might have somehow prevented the end of Nirvana, in the way that a butterfly's wing can cause a hurricane. So it can be argued that Jimmy Swaggart possibly had a hand in Kurt's death.]


In the most recent few years, I worked as a telephone tech support guy for a dial-up Internet service. Now that all of that has been shipped overseas, I am again virtually unemployable, unless I face again the blank page, which I simply do not wish to do.

I was never particularly fond of the writing process itself, but many writers agree that the only joy in writing is the last period on the last page. When I was in the magazine business, my momentum carried me forward.

Now that I've lost that momentum, I am at a loss as to where to put my energies to make a living. In the meantime, if you do any shopping at Macy's this Christmas, you may see me in men's furnishings, tidying up the underwear and socks displays.
Exact Likeness
ninku
Nov. 15th, 2004 @ 12:15 am What bugs me today.


Mark Kermode in "Ill Effects: The Media/Violence Debate" (Routledge),
edited by Martin Barker and Julian Petley


Precisely.

It will be 25 years this January since I was hired to edit the magazine Fangoria, and today by chance I stumbled across this passage by Brit Mark Kermode, an observer of the horror film scene, said by many to be quite astute. He's the first person to see Fango as I intended it to be seen in that quarter-century. Or at least the first to express it exactly as I would.

I would very much like to insert a complaint here about my current situation, spongeing off relatives while waiting to hear whether Macy's is willing to give me a few weeks work in retail sales during their holiday season, but I'm feeling very Republican about myself today; no one else need say "it's your own damn fault," because I am saying it myself. I'm just not a sufficiently industrious person.
Exact Likeness
ninku
Nov. 14th, 2004 @ 12:21 am Bad time to start a blog.
Saw the Korean film "Fighter in the Wind" tonight, it was quite depressing. The fight scenes were certainly dramatic, but the main character, Korean martial arts master Choi Baedal (better known by his Japanese name, Mas Oyama), was a cartoon, certainly not the Mas Oyama that I admired when he made TV appearances promoting the Japanese art of karate back in the 1950's and 60's.

Dong-kun Yang plays him (and the director seems to see him) as a "sensual man-brute," but that does not quite tally with his acknowledged devotion to the warrior principles of Miyamoto Musashi. There's no suggestion of an intellectual or spiritual life beneath Yang's wildman hair-do, yet Musashi's work embodies both. And that hairdo! Seems the filmmakers never saw pictures of Oyama in that era.




Nothing in the plot brings forward Musashi's principals for the warrior's lifestyle. Instead we see Oyama repeatedly efface himself with a likeable humility that has more to do with Korea's fascination with Japan's power than with the spirit or substance of Musashi's writings.

Plus, a cookie-cutter plot lifted from any 1970's Chinese gung-fu epic (crude villager finds master - master gets assasinated by villain - student trains for a year - student comes back to kick ass) leaves us with a pretty dull movie.

Artistically, it's nothing much. Politically, it's a pack of lies.

The Korean-made film has Oyama, already a fighter, leaving Korea in order to be trained as a pilot in Japan, arriving near the end of the war. According to the film, he was betrayed by the Japanese when they drafted him to join a kamikaze squad, with no flight training.

In fact, Choi arrived in Japan in 1938, and immediately adopted his Japanese name; he entered the Yamanashi Youth Air Force Academy before the war began. It was as a part of his military training that he was introduced to his first karate master, and discovered his own talent.

He had no problems in the air force until near the end of the war, when he struck a superior officer. He was spared severe punishment when it was determined that the officer provoked the attack; Oyama was then transferrred to the Pacific, serving there briefly before the Japanese surrender (which Oyama took as a great blow to his own sense of honor, while the film version falsely suggests that Japan's defeat was a matter of indifference, or perhaps even celebration, for him).

In one particular flight of fancy, the film shows Oyama practicing as a sort of "super-hero" during the American occupation, the "Brave Tiger" who beats the asses of American servicemen who abuse Japanese women; according to the film, an escalating "dead or alive" bounty was placed on Oyama's head, presumably by those evil Americans. And why is Oyama doing this? In order to impress a Japanese geisha with whom he's fallen in love.

In fact, there was one incident that this segment is based upon; Oyama did once come to the rescue of a woman who was being harassed by a Japanese, who threatened him with a knife. Oyama's single blow killed his assailant.

Though it was clearly an instance of self-defense, Oyama was horror-struck by this incident, and resolved to give up martial arts. He approached the man's widow, and worked the family farm for several months, until the widow assured him that she could maintain the farm without him. (This bit is in the film, but the dead man is portrayed as part of the gang that assassinated Oyama's master.)

It was this death, not anyone's assassination, that led Oyama to go to the mountains and train in solitude for 18 months, a step he took at the advice of his master.

There was a lot more to Oyama's life, but thankfully the movie leaves that alone. One thing for sure -- he did not hate the Japanese, and he didn't hate America, which he visited often to spread his karate teachings. The filmmakers here have used Oyama to slander two countries that Oyama, wisely or not, actually held in high regard.

Oyama was the best-known karate name in the 50's and 60's, not just in Asia but in the US and around the world. His books on karate were THE standard texts at karate schools through the 1970's, and are still available through Amazon today, a decade after his death.

Exact Likeness
ninku